Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Chapter I - page 2

PAGE 2

Panel 1: Detective #2: “Do you think you black out before you hit the sidewalk, or what?”
This question will be answered in a later flashback.

Also, in the distant background we see one of the zeppelins that will pepper the skylines of the book, signifying this is a different Earth from ours, and also symbolically displaying the reality that Dr. Manhattan – whose symbol is a hydrogen atom, which would be the fuel for the zeppelins – is looming above everything in this brave new world.

Panel 3: With this panel, we see something novel for comics in the mid-80s, though more commonly utilized today – the use of color to evoke an emotion or imprint a scene or scenes with a common hue. The flashback scenes of Edward Blake’s murder are all bathed in red.

Panel 5: “He would have put up some kind’a fight, I’m certain.” We can see with the imagery – and again, we see the juxtaposition between words and images – just how hard a time the victim was having of it, despite his physical size.

Panel 7: “Maybe he just got soft.”

Again, this statement juxtaposes with the imagery, and we can see that, although he’s taking a pounding, Blake is someone who has not lived a soft life. We also see that, contrary to the theory these detectives are positing, it appears it was only one person that took out Blake. Of course, the point of view of the reader is such, that this is not conclusive.

Panel 8: “It’s Vice President Ford!”

This is our first indication that the world in which the Watchmen live is not the same as the world in which we are living. Ford was out of office – as the President – in 1976, but this story takes place in 1985.

Monday, January 2, 2012

Chapter I - page 1 + cover

Cover Image: As we will see in future issues, a common design element for each of the twelve chapters is that the cover image is always an extreme close-up of the first panel within the issue proper, essentially making the cover the first panel of each issue. Here we see a close-up of what will be one of the major recurring symbols throughout Watchmen – that of the smiley faced button with its spot of blood above the right eye.
PAGE 1

Panel 1: Introduction to Rorschach through his journal. The initial statement: “Dog carcass in alley this morning, tire tread on burst stomach,” relates directly to a later issue in which we discover Rorschach’s origin and the incident that sent him over the edge to crazed vigilante.

We also see a storytelling technique that Moore & Gibbons use liberally throughout the book – though often for very different reasons. That is, a bit of dialogue is juxtaposed against the image in order to, among other things, heighten readers’ awareness of events, comment upon two varying scenes, or offer a bit of irony to the audience. In this case the statement: “I have seen its true face,” hangs just above the bloody smiley faced button in the gutter.

Panel 2: Again, the juxtaposition of dialogue and imagery, as Rorschach writes: “The streets are extended gutters . . . full of blood” over a scene focused on a gutter that is full of blood.

Also, note the first clue to Rorschach’s identity as his feet walk out of the journal entry into the blood, foreshadowing the bloody path down which he and his fellow “heroes” are about to tread.

Panel 3: First look at the man holding the “The End is Nigh” sign – whom I’ve seen dubbed the Doomsayer elsewhere but whose name we will discover is Walter Kovacs, alter-ego of Rorschach.

We also have more dialogue/imagery juxtaposition with Rorschach’s: “. . . I’ll look down and whisper ‘no.’ ”seen from a camera angle above the two men in the panel.

Panel 4: And more juxtaposition as we read Rorschach’s journal entry: “They could have followed in the footsteps of good men . . .” and see Kovacs’s bloody footprints lead away from the pool of blood.

Panel 5: The camera angle continues to pull back higher and higher as Rorschach writes: “. . . and didn’t realize that the trail led over a precipice . . .”

Also note our first clue as to who killed the Comedian. The large truck in front of the bloodstained sidewalk sports a pyramid within a circle, the corporate logo for Adrian Veidt’s companies.

Panel 6: The camera rises still higher as the pool of blood becomes nothing but a spot on the scenery below. Rorschach writes: “. . . the whole world stands on the brink, staring down into bloody hell . . .” which also foreshadows later events.

And the statement: “. . . nobody can think of anything to say.” carries over into

Panel 7: as an ironic comment on the detective’s flippant remark: “That’s quite a drop.”

This panel, and the slow pan away from the gutter in panels one through six, also highlights a visual theme for this issue, that of great heights (whether that of these skyscrapers or, figuratively, those heights to which the heroes once attained) and staring down into the abyss.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Chapter I - thematic overview

CHAPTER I:
At Midnight, All the Agents . . .

First, a caveat:

In his introduction for the re-issue of Alfred Bester’s The Stars My Destination, Neil Gaiman wrote, “. . . you can no more read the same book again than you can step into the same river.” Which is true. When I first read The Lord of the Rings as a teenager it had a very different meaning than when I read it in my early thirties. I had matured, my understanding of the world had grown, and I had broadened my experiences during the interim fifteen or so years. It was a far different book than the one I remembered, because my perspective had evolved.

Which is to say, there are many themes one can pluck from Watchmen and its individual chapters. It all depends upon your point of view. As an introduction to each chapter, I have chosen to discuss a specific theme or visual motif found within that chapter, as a way to look at the chapter in toto and to get you, the reader, into a proper mindset for what follows. I chose to focus on a single theme with each chapter in order to keep you, and me, from getting bogged down under the weight of my own words, and to make each of these chapters a bit less cumbersome. I would also encourage you to dig a little deeper into your own reading of this book and see what other theme and motifs you discover. I hope you enjoy.

A note on Spoilers:

 I am going to assume that if you’re reading this, you have already read Alan Moore & Dave Gibbons’s Watchmen. With that in mind, please note that spoilers abound in what follows. In fact, arguably the two biggest mysteries in Watchmen (the identity of Edward Blake’s killer and the identity of Rorschach) are given away in the annotations for panels 5 & 3, respectively, of page 1. So, please be forewarned: these annotations are meant to enhance one’s reading experience of Watchmen and it would be doing yourself a disservice to continue from here without having read the source material first.

Thematic Overview:

As Watchmen opens, it has been eight years since passage of the Keene Act, a law that outlawed masked vigilantes. In the 1985 of this story only three heroes are still active – Dr. Manhattan and the Comedian both work for the U.S. government while Rorschach continues his fight against injustice in his own inimitable manner. Despite this, these heroes – even those who have retired – loom large over this world’s landscape. They drive public policy and scientific advancements from the shadows, shaping this world in ways that could not be imagined by the “common man.”

Throughout this first issue, Dave Gibbons accentuates the sense of these heroes towering above the landscape, and the people, through his visuals. In fact, we experience this in the opening scene. As the camera pulls up and away from the blood-splattered smiley face button, we ultimately reach the scene of the crime. At an almost vertiginous height, we meet the detectives in charge of the case as they peer out from the window of Eddie Blake’s apartment – the pool of blood on the sidewalk now little more than a spot of red.

Lofty heights are also utilized when introducing most of the other main characters – Rorschach, Adrian Veidt (Ozymandias), Dr. Manhattan and Laurie Juspeczyk (Silk Spectre II). We first see Rorschach as he approaches Blake’s apartment building (our vantage point is from beneath Rorschach, giving us a sense of the skyline above him), and watch him scale the side of the building to enter Blake’s apartment. Veidt is introduced in the penthouse of his corporate tower, a skyscraper that appears to overlook the entirety of New York City. Dr. Manhattan, who can modify his body in any manner, is introduced to us – along with Laurie – as a giant at least as tall as seven full-grown men. We, the readers, are meant to feel insignificant in relation to these characters through their depictions in these introductory scenes. It is worth noting that the only member of the Watchmen not introduced in this manner is Dan Dreiberg, the second Nite Owl, who is also the most grounded of these heroes.

The use of this visual motif throughout the initial chapter is interesting and says a lot about the characters as well as the setting of this book. By dint of the book’s title alone, we know the Watchmen are the main protagonists, despite the fact that most of them are no longer active agents. But still, they hang over this world like a dark cloud, affecting the status quo – particularly Dr. Manhattan – so dramatically that the average person might feel obsolete. The general populace is scared of these vigilantes, which is why the government disbanded the Watchmen and outlawed masked vigilantes.

This use of vertiginous imagery also helps us understand the psychological make-up of the heroes as well. Blake and Veidt are characters who are motivated by the moral superiority the feel the hold over everyone else. Veidt’s unmatched intelligence and physical prowess, in his mind, feeds his belief that he should be the final arbiter of mankind’s path. While the Comedian (Blake) always harbored disdain for the rest of the heroes, who, in his mind, didn’t understand the big picture. He laughed at their attempts to curb crime by attacking the symptoms – drug pushers, prostitutes, petty criminals, supervillains” – when he knew that nothing would change unless they were willing to attack the source – those corrupt individuals with political or economic power. And Dr. Manhattan’s detachment from the rest of humanity is visualized brilliantly in his opening scene – his nearly fifty-foot-tall blue frame not only exhibits his unbelievable powers, but also punctuates his emotional distance from what it means to be a human being.

There are many other instances of this visual motif throughout the issue and the rest of the series. It is one of the things that comics can do so well, offering subtle visual cues that can enhance the mood or themes of a story. This was one of the stated aims of Moore & Gibbons with Watchmen – to expand what was possible within the medium and to focus on the unique aspects of storytelling in comics without losing the basic premise, tell a good story. It is this ambition, coupled with their respective talent, that spurs me to return to Watchmen year after year, only to discover something new with each reading that I hadn’t experienced before.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: a mission statement


One of my intended goals with this project is to illuminate readers to the symbolism, foreshadowing, and other “literary” elements found within Watchmen.  I know many people eschew such examination, arguing “how can one know the intentions of an author without having asked him or her specifically?”  I can certainly understand this point of view, but that argument, to me, misses the point of how we, as a society, read and interpret stories. 

J.R.R. Tolkien railed against those critics who saw The Lord of the Rings as an allegory for the Second World War, refuting such claims as false.  Tolkien, in writing his lengthy adventure tale, did not consciously inject such allegory into his narrative.  In fact, in interviews I have read, Tolkien stridently argued against the use of allegory in fiction.

For me, the beauty of fiction is that we, as readers, bring our personal experiences and knowledge to a work of prose, interpreting it through our own unique cultural prism.  It is this infusing of our experiences that can make a narrative burn itself onto our brains, lingering with us long after we have turned the final page. 

Does this mean our interpretation is always the right one?  That’s really a tough question because one’s distinct interpretation of a narrative can certainly ring true.  But what if the lens through which one absorbs such a narrative includes realities and experiences anachronistic to the author?  Can it be a “true” reading of the work, if such knowledge was never afforded that of the author?  Maybe. 

My hope with this site is to enrich your reading of Alan Moore’s & Dave Gibbons’s masterpiece.  Though many argue its merits, I feel Watchmen is the best example of what is uniquely possible within the comic medium.  Alan Moore has stated in many interviews that it is a failing to consider comics little more than movies on paper.  Each storytelling medium has aspects specific to that medium, storytelling possibilities that cannot be replicated successfully when adapted to another medium. 

Movies utilize time, pushing the narrative forward (even when a director like Alejandro González Iñárritu plays with time in a film) with no opportunity – if enjoyed as intended in a movie theater – to go back and re-watch some earlier part.  Prose is able to delve into the minds of the characters, offering depth and breadth not possible in a two or three hour film.  Comics allow the reader to flip back and forth between pages, to appreciate a page as a whole, tangentially, while focusing in on specific panels.  And the message of a panel can be so much more – it can provide symbolism layered upon the surface narrative while also creating an intimacy between the author and the audience.    

Moore and Gibbons worked to capitalize on the unique aspects of the comic medium, to exploit what is possible within a very structured format in order to elevate the form, when they conceived and created Watchmen.  And I feel nobody has succeeded at this as well as these two did with this book.  Does that mean there haven’t been “greater works” produced in the medium since 1986?  No.  Does this mean there have not been more moving and similarly innovative creations produced since 1986?  No.  But it does mean that, although experimentation within this storytelling medium has continued to progress, very few have embraced those aspects unique to the medium, and none have done it as broadly and with such consistency throughout a single narrative as Moore and Gibbons did.

Ultimately, this site is only my interpretation of Watchmen, informed by readings and podcasts and discussions I’ve had since first reading it in 1987.  Some of my influences, and certainly some of the resources that helped inform my examination of Watchmen, can be found in the sidebar.  Check them out. They’re well worth your time. 

And please understand I do not expect this to be an exhaustive “be all and end all” examination of Watchmen.  I am sure there will be many things missed by me.  That is where you come in.  Please speak up, chime in, comment, let me know if you have a different interpretation of something I’ve written or if I totally bypassed a significant bit of allusion or symbolism that you feel bears mentioning.  I’m not infallible – though I like to think so – and I welcome your contributions.

Thank you,

chris

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Legion of Dudes - "Who Reads the Watchmen" podcasts

More “groundwork” as I prep for the official launch of Reading Watchmen in January.

The second podcast I discovered during the run-up to the Watchmen film was the then newly-minted Legion of Dudes podcast, an offshoot of Half Hour Wasted. The LOD, as they are colloquially known, led off with a bi-weekly examination of Watchmen, and, as with the CGS Footnotes podcasts, they brought another perspective to this book that allowed me to better appreciate what Moore & Gibbons achieved with Watchmen. Below are those initial podcasts.

Also, as Ben Truman pointed out to me, these podcasts will ruin the end of the book for you, if you've never read it before, so SPOILER WARNING!!!

Enjoy,
chris


Chapter I











Chapter II











Chapter III











Chapter IV











Chapter V











Chapter VI











Chapter VII











Chapter VIII











Chapter IX











Chapter X











Chapter XI, pt.1











Chapter XI, pt.2











Chapter XII, pt.1











Chapter XII, pt.2